too good to be true

just a quick update.

if something sounds too good to be true, it probably is. the possibility of the downfall of manto therefore won't happen. interestingly the anc has now claimed they were always aware of her conviction of theft. maybe they viewed that as an attribute that perfectly qualifies her for a top position.

seems she got her liver transplant legitimately (hmmm?). she has at no stage questioned allegations of alcoholism, so i think we can assume that the reason for the liver failure is self evident.

thabo mbeki, the president has publically praised the minister as a hero of the people (the hiv negative ones maybe) and stated that she is doing a great job.

meanwhile some guy writes a book about what a great leader thabo mbeki is. he then goes on to say that all people who have been advocating antiretroviral drugs as treatment for hiv owe the afforementioned 'great leader' an apology. this has to do with the fact that antiretrovirals have more side effects than garlic and beetroot (which is what thabo and manto propose as first line treatment of hiv)

so, in summary, our convicted thief health minister who denies the use of antiretrovirals as important in the fight against aids is not only still in control but fully backed by the government of the day, the anc.

the powerful horn

the basic topic behind this post it seems to me will tend to reccur. i therefore must accept it and get on with the post.

i presently have a patient in my care who has a very tragic story. he is hiv positive with a cd4 count of 25. (not good). he works in umtata in the eastern cape. there he went to a sangoma, apparently complaining of chronic diaree and generally not feeling too well. the sangoma decided the needed treatment was an enema administered through a strong bull's horn. the horn was duly inserted into the anus, through the anteriour rectum wall and the enema was pumped freely into the peritoneal cavity. (although a strong bull's horn might be the desired mode of administration, possibly because a weak bull's horn would have lesser curing potential, i personally think that something slightly less traumatic may just suffice). as you can imagine, the patient didn't improve. in fact he got worse. he then presented to a surgeon (a few days later) who operated. the rectum was repaired, the abdomen was rinsed and that was that. or was it??

a few days later, the patient developed acute abdomen again. the surgeon took him back to theater. the notes report he found multiple spontaneous perforations of the cecum (completely the other end of the colon) as well as breakdown of the rectum repair. these were all repaired, a transverse loop colostomy was brought out and pensil drains were left in the abdomen. the abdomen was only loosely closed.

at about this stage the patient mentioned he came from nelspruit and was duly posted off to me. when he arrived here, he was in prerenal kidney failure, his liver enzymes were totally deranged (possibly overwhelming sepsis but just as possibly the direct known hepatotoxic effect of many sangoma concoctions) his viral load was as high as his cd4 count was low and his white cell count was a dismal 2,6 as opposed to a crp of over 300. he was leaking feces from everywhere. the entire laparotomy wound was one massive contaminated mess.

what to do?? i decided to operate (after appropriate attention to his fluid state). inside was a sewer. there was no corner of the abdomen spared. my basic plan was to exteriorise everything. inside the cecum was a sieve of multiple holes and necrosis. the rectum had broken down again. there was also a spontaneous hole in the small bowel (middle). i did a right hemicolectomy with an end ileostomy and brought the colon out through it's own site. i debrided and repaired the small bowel hole. i rinsed copiously. i placed drains absolutely everywhere. i placed a post treitz feeding tube. i closed with tension sutures. i bundled him off to icu. i prayed. i might have muddled the order of things, but icu was towards the end. what was interesting to note at operation was the total lack of fibrin or any adhesions in the abdomen. the body wasn't even trying to heal itself.

the patient still developed leaks. i'm now going for controlled fistulas. some things are not so bad. he is no longer intubated. his kidney function recovered. his liver function is on the mend. but quite frankly i wonder what his chances are with zero immune response and zero healing.

i wish i had more time to discuss this case. there are so many interesting points. a starting point may be the fact that my physician friends told me i should have left him to die, arguing that it was not right to dedicate a long term icu bed to someone who would die anyway, thereby depriving the bed from someone else who has a chance. besides the obvious feelings of loss and failure if he dies, i'll be the butt of many of their jokes. the converse is not true. if he lives there will be no acknowledgements or accolades.

the other point is the sangoma and his role in the treatment of hiv. bear in mind our minister of health publicly says their role is crucial. i differ somewhat. (this is not an isolated incident). it is always also fascinationg to me to see how they are totally absolved of responsibility when things go pear shaped. in fact if the patient dies there will be fingers of accusation levelled at the western medical establishment from them. "see even the western doctors couldn't save him" or worse "look how sick their western medicine made him".

but if i could give any advice, when you have hiv and your cd4 count is 25, don't get a rectal perforation. it is not a good idea.